Re: Summary of last meeting and date for next meeting

Aldo,

    thanks for the pointer to FRED. I will look at it.

Concerning the overlap with the Dagstuhl workshop: you are right, so 
let's postpone to the 14th of September and then have a biweekly turn 
(i.e. 28th of September, 12th of October etc.)

I will update the wiki accordingly.

Best regards,

Philipp.

Am 18.07.12 20:08, schrieb Aldo Gangemi:
> Thanks Philipp, and sorry again for another missed telecon during a 
> trip of mine.
> "Affected use case" is more precise, but a bit strange term, I'd 
> rather keep Relevant.
> Ok with the responsibilities.
> A remark about the September 6th date: it's during the Dagstuhl 
> seminar you are organizing on the multilingual semantic web, are you 
> sure you want to keep that date?
>
> A last word for self-promotion: my lab has realized a couple of tools 
> (FRED and Tipalo) [1], which are relevant for the Ontology-Lexicon 
> interface, although not directly related to standardisation issues.
> They foster the structuring of linguistically-expressed knowledge into 
> linked data, and we would be pleased to receive suggestions and 
> criticism by the ontolex group. Behind the curtains, there is a pile 
> of technologies that would certainly benefit from a shared vocabulary, 
> and specially FRED would be another nice use case for the group.
>
> Ciao
> Aldo
>
> [1] http://wit.istc.cnr.it/stlab-tools
>
> On 18 Jul 2012, at 14:29, Philipp Cimiano wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> and just to clarify what the description of the requirements should 
>> include:
>>
>> Under "Description", there should be a general description of the 
>> requirement, its implications, etc. It is important that we think 
>> here in terms of requirements on the general model, not on particular 
>> data categories, properties, etc. but on requirements at the 
>> meta-model level.
>>
>> Under "Relevant Use Cases": here we should just list the IDs of the 
>> use cases touched by this requirement. Maybe this should be called 
>> "Affected Use Cases" ???
>>
>> "Relation to Use Case": here we should give detailed examples from 
>> the use cases where the requirement is important, thus grounding our 
>> requirements in the use cases we have collected.
>>
>> If there are any questions on this, just shoot.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Philipp.
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 18.07.12 14:24, schrieb Philipp Cimiano:
>>> Dear ontolex members,
>>>
>>> during our last meeting on the 6th of July, we discussed my 
>>> condensed list of requirements on the model and agreed that it looks 
>>> promising to work on the basis of these from now on.
>>>
>>> See here: 
>>> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements
>>>
>>> The older list of unstructured requirements is linked from the 
>>> bottom of the page.
>>>
>>> We fixed the following responsibles to produce a first draft of the 
>>> requirement and kick-off the discussions on this mailinglist. (We 
>>> really need to start the discussion on the relevant issues!)
>>>
>>> - Express Meaning with respect to ontology: John/Philipp/Aldo/Guido
>>> - Lexical Variation and Paraphrases: Philipp
>>> - Relation between lexical entries: Lupe/Elena
>>> - Lexical and linguistic properties of lexical entries: John/Philipp
>>> - Valence and Ontological Mapping: John/Philipp
>>> - High-Order Predicate Mapping: John/Philipp
>>> - Lexico-Syntactic Patterns: Elena/Dagmar
>>> - Metadata about lexicon: Armando
>>> - Modelling lexical resources: John/Aldo
>>>
>>> The goal would be to have a detailed specification and an ongoing 
>>> discussion on this mailinglist by end of August.
>>>
>>> The next teleconference will be on September 6th, 15:00 - 17:00 
>>> (CET). It will be two hours as we decided to skip the one in August 
>>> due to holiday period.
>>>
>>> We also decided to have biweekly teleconferences from September on. 
>>> I think it is important to keep things moving quickly. Otherwise I 
>>> have the feeling that not much happens in between our monthly 
>>> teleconferences.
>>>
>>> I am now on holidays for two weeks and will then start working on 
>>> the requirements assigned to me.
>>> Needless to say, everyone should feel free to start working on their 
>>> requirements as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> If you think that an important requirement is missing, please post 
>>> it on the list and we will discuss it.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Philipp.
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>> Semantic Computing Group
>> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>> University of Bielefeld
>>
>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de 
>> <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>>
>> Room H-127
>> Morgenbreede 39
>> 33615 Bielefeld
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _____________________________________
>
> Aldo Gangemi
> Senior Researcher
> Semantic Technology Lab (STLab)
> Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology,
> National Research Council (ISTC-CNR)
> Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma, Italy
> Tel: +390644161535
> Fax: +390644161513
> aldo.gangemi@cnr.it <mailto:aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>
> http://www.stlab.istc.cnr.it
> http://www.istc.cnr.it/people/aldo-gangemi
> skype aldogangemi
> okkam ID: http://www.okkam.org/entity/ok200707031186131660596
>


-- 
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
Semantic Computing Group
Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
University of Bielefeld

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Room H-127
Morgenbreede 39
33615 Bielefeld