- From: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:50:37 +0100
- To: "Armando Stellato" <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
- Cc: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@gmail.com>, "'John McCrae'" <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, "'Philipp Cimiano'" <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D843E4D8-930F-4EC7-9261-B97F35EFB6A2@gmail.com>
Yes Armando, I agree that we need more specific cases for LLD. I attempted some (quite generic) in the example section. I suggest to collect more specific ones via email or directly in the wiki, and discuss them on the go. --Aldo On 11 Jan 2012, at 18:50, Armando Stellato wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ve added a few lines to the necessary knowledge section of LLD. However, I already found it very good and clear. > My only remark out-of-the-wiki is that it does not seem to be a use case, but a list of requisites for the definition of (part of) the model related to language resources description. Even the use of the various sections is different from the typical use cases. > However, providing that it is very clear in its intentions and that we just need something to understand what we want to do, I would suggest to continue on this line. > Cheers, > Armando > > From: johnmccrae@gmail.com [mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of John McCrae > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:07 PM > To: Philipp Cimiano > Cc: public-ontolex@w3.org > Subject: Re: Use Cases > > Hi all, > > I have added the OMT use case > > Aldo> The LLD use case looks really good... I tried to expand a bit on the Wiktionary section > > Nitish/Paul> The CLIR use case still needs some expansion > > Who owns the NER use case or should we remove it? > > Regards, > John > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Hi Aldo, > > yes, the update is great. > > John/Armando: can you please check if this is in synch with your understanding of the use case? > > Best regards, > > Philipp. > > Am 10.01.12 20:09, schrieb Aldo Gangemi: > > Hi, I've just updated the LLD use case description. > Philipp, Paul: is that in line with your vision? > John, Armando: could you please revise the current version? > --Aldo > > On 22 Dec 2011, at 21:48, Philipp Cimiano wrote: > > Dear all, > > may I remind you all to complete the use case descriptions:http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Use_Cases > > I have provided a first rough description of the "Cross-lingual information retrieval" use case. > > We will go through the use case descriptions in detail on our next telco on the 13th of January, 15:00 - 17:00 CET. > > I wish you merry christmas and a good start into the new year. > > Philipp. > > > -- > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > Semantic Computing Group > Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) > University of Bielefeld > > Phone: +49 521 106 12249 > Fax: +49 521 106 12412 > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > Room H-127 > Morgenbreede 39 > 33615 Bielefeld > > > > > > > -- > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > Semantic Computing Group > Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) > University of Bielefeld > > Phone: +49 521 106 12249 > Fax: +49 521 106 12412 > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > Room H-127 > Morgenbreede 39 > 33615 Bielefeld > > > _____________________________________ Aldo Gangemi Senior Researcher Semantic Technology Lab (STLab) Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology, National Research Council (ISTC-CNR) Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma, Italy Tel: +390644161535 Fax: +390644161513 aldo.gangemi@cnr.it http://www.stlab.istc.cnr.it http://www.istc.cnr.it/createhtml.php?nbr=71 skype aldogangemi okkam ID: http://www.okkam.org/entity/ok200707031186131660596
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 22:59:08 UTC