Re: ODRL Profile for Data Sovereignty

From the screenshot, last week it was highlighted that IRI's are still only at the "proposed" stage and have limited adoption.

https://chatgpt.com/share/67807443-74f0-800a-8e4d-d5f7bac4d4a3

___________________________________
Joshua Cornejo
marketdata <https://www.marketdata.md/>
smart authorisation management for the AI-era

On 14/01/2025, 02:45, "Renato Iannella" <r@iannel.la> wrote:

    The ODRL Model is open (and “flexible") to allow any form for specifying rightOperands:
    
    
    
    But clearly the use of URIs is the (industry wide) preferred option (open linked data etc…)
    
    Cheers - Renato
    
    
    > On 13 Jan 2025, at 19:03, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com> wrote:
    > 
    > Thanks Renato. Interesting piece and I'll look at it in more detail.
    > Though I think it would be better to not have strings like this: https://profile.mydata-control.de/ods/#example-3
    > 
    > "rightOperand":  [{ "@value": "emergency", "@type": "xsd:string" }],
    > 
    > And to have a controlled vocabulary to avoid issues that arise with string-based expressions and multilingual policies. (E.g. in dpv, this might be something like dpv:EmergencyManagement which would be an IRI and which can be further expanded to justify what is the emergency etc.)
    > 
    > Is this type of modelling part of ODRL best practices already?
    > 
    > Regards, Harsh

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2025 08:19:41 UTC