- From: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la>
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:49:45 +1000
- To: Joshua Cornejo <josh@marketdata.md>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
Hi Joshua, includedIn and implies are used in defining Actions.
Here is an example:
odrl:annotate a odrl:Action, skos:Concept ;
odrl:includedIn odrl:use ;
rdfs:label "Annotate"@en ;
skos:definition "To add explanatory notations/commentaries to the Asset without modifying the Asset in any other way."@en ;
skos:scopeNote "Non-Normative"@en .
We don’t use any “implies” examples in the model/vocab - but these can appear in Profiles…
Cheers - R
> On 8 Mar 2024, at 19:36, Joshua Cornejo <josh@marketdata.md> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> As I’m double-checking, I have come to realise that in the diagram (https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/00Model.svg) the arrows for “includedIn” and “implies” are not directly related to the definition of an action within a rule being created, and that they are semantic-based and defined within the ontology (or at least that is what the documentation, profiles and ontology appear to tell me) to be used within a rule being evaluated.
>
>
> I would suggest if that is the correct interpretation and for clarity, the lines should be in a different notation (dotted?) and perhaps the same notation should apply to ‘inheritFrom’, ‘subClass’ and ‘partOf’.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> __________________
> Joshua Cornejo
> josh@marketdata.md
> +44 7980 859678
>
Received on Saturday, 9 March 2024 02:50:08 UTC