of Duties

Hello,

 

I am reading 2.6.4 Obligation property with a Policy and trying to understand in which use case a Party will have to fulfil an obligation without it being triggered by odrl:Permission or by a odrl:consequence. 

 

Example 20 implies that assignee person:44 has to pay €500 … but it is getting nothing (no Target nor Action) and has done nothing (no Action), so it doesn’t explain “why” it has to be fulfilled.

 

Example 21 expands a bit by having an action and a target. It is good to illustrate the structure, it shows how to articulate a Duty, but doesn’t explain what triggered the rule. This on actually looks like a separate dimension for an “audit” type role (obligation says delete – assignee didn’t execute the action “delete”, therefore must compensate) and can’t be evaluated.

 

Regards,

___________________________________

Joshua Cornejo

marketdata

embed open standards 

across your supply chain