- From: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 22:14:24 +1000
- To: Jim Larson <jim42@larson-tech.com>, Bruce Epstien <bepstein@bfd.fr>
- Cc: "public-odrl@w3.org Group" <public-odrl@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 5 June 2022 12:14:48 UTC
Thanks Jim…. is this closer… The agreement is a typical databaseOwner will allow databaseUser to “use” (or anything more narrow) databaseX. There is then a duty on “voiceSystem” to validate the speaker whose voice must = databaseUser Cheers - R > On 4 Jun 2022, at 02:25, Jim Larson <jim42@larson-tech.com> wrote: > > The picture helps clarify what the agreement is! > > I would like to add that the target should be “Database X” that Jim wants to access. > > I have modified the picture as follows: > > Within Asset: The asset target should be “Database X” We want siri to approve that Jim is permitted to access Database X. > Within Party: There are two parties: Jim and Siri. Jim will speak to Siri. Siri will either validate or invalidate if Jim can access Database X > Within Duty there is an Asssignee:Siri This indicates that siri will make the decision regarding if Jim’s voice command will be granted > Within Action: siri: validateSpeaker. Siri listens to Jim speak and determines if the person speaking is really Jim > To generalize from the specific person “Jim” to any person, replace “Jim” by “personY” in both the Party box and the Refinement box. > What do you think? > > Regards, > > -Jim >
Received on Sunday, 5 June 2022 12:14:48 UTC