Re: REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0

Thanks Daniel, we shall review that section and provide comments/feedback.
(added to ODRL CG issue list [1])

Renato

[1] https://github.com/w3c/odrl/issues/4 <https://github.com/w3c/odrl/issues/4>

> On 20 Jul 2018, at 23:16, Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The Verifiable Claims Working Group's one standards-track specification, "Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0", is beyond First Public Working Draft but not yet ready for Candidate Recommendation.
> 
> Since you were the group that did the Permissions and Obligations Expressions work, we would like to ask for any early comments you might have on our admittedly incomplete specification, in an attempt to address any major issues earlier rather than later.
> 
> Would your group (or some members of your group) be willing to give the document an informal read-through?  We are looking for comments within approximately a 60-day timeframe if possible.
> 
> The best place for comments is directly in our GitHub repo [1] as new issues, but comments sent to our comments mailing list [2] work as well.  Comments on either the (stable) dated draft [3] or the live Editor's Draft [4] are fine, whichever is easiest for you.
> 
> If you need anything else from us first, please don't hesitate to contact the chairs directly.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Dan Burnett and Matt Stone, Co-chairs, Verifiable Claims Working Group
> 
> CC: Specification editors
> 
> 
> [1] GitHub repo:  https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model <https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model>
> [2] Mailing list:  public-vc-comments@w3.org <mailto:public-vc-comments@w3.org>
> [3] Most recent dated (fixed) draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/WD/2018-07-18/ <https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/WD/2018-07-18/>
> [4] Tip of tree editor's draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/ <https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/>
>