RE: Comment on Action vocabulary

Renato and all:

 

I'm happy with both "update(To)" and "modify" as long as we define that this
is a change of existing data of an asset.

 

But in the context of the aim to keep the Action vocabulary simple I
question if we really need both writeTo (adding data to the asset) and
appendTo (adding data to the asset at its end) - isn't that overly granular?

And hearing comments from outside our group - so with a fresh view on the
Actions - I agree that the term writeTo does not tell that this is adding
data - many will take this granting to edit data.

 

My favourite design is:

* modify or update: The Assigner permits/prohibits the Assignee(s) to
modify/update existing data of the Asset

    * addTo: The Assigner permits/prohibits the Assignee(s) to add data to
the Asset

 

Michael

 

From: Renato Iannella [mailto:ri@semanticidentity.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 2:28 PM
To: ODRL Community Group
Subject: Re: Comment on Action vocabulary

 

We used to have "modify" in ODRL Version 1.1

Perhaps we welcome it back? (as the parent for writeTo, appendTo)


Renato