- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:29:43 +1000
- To: ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 04:30:13 UTC
On 23 Jan 2014, at 03:45, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org> wrote: > In the proposal of a modified action vocabulary with structures and some changes to definitions on > http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/wiki/Vocabulary_Definitions > submitted by IPTC in December 2013, we – IPTC – have renamed the action “license” to “use” as the conclusion from a long discussion was that this term fits better the need to express “this action addresses any kind of (permitted = licensed) use of an asset”. Back in ODRL V1.1 [1] we grouped all the actions into related categories (like "usage", "transfer", "asset mgt", "reuse")....should we reconsider this now (and make those groups actions themselves?) Also, I notice that all/most of the definitions now begins with "The Assigner permits/prohibits the Assignee(s) to execute the act of..." instead of "The act of..." Does this create issues with ODRL policy types that do not have assigners and/or assignees? Renato [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl/
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 04:30:13 UTC