On 29 Apr 2013, at 18:21, "Michael Steidl (IPTC)" <mdirector@iptc.org>
wrote:
> I think the essential modification ?by a RightsML profile - is to define that the referenced parent does not have to be an ODRL policy. It would make sense to have an identifier for a group of contracts of a new provider and finding such an identifier should have the meaning: be aware that this policy is an extension (or restriction, depends on how you view it) of a policy in a written natural language document issued by that content provider.
The thought occurs that much the same applies if there is an ODRL policy, but it's not in a format which the consumer might understand ? e.g., it's in Turtle, but the consumer only understands JSON-LD, or XML?
M.
--
Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development,
Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA,
MC3 D4, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ,
0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E
-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------