Should we alter "payeeParty" and "payAmount" to instead reference "compensation"?

In reviewing the changes to the ODRL Common Vocabulary

http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-common-vocabulary-constraint-draft-changes/#section-Change

I see that we have deprecated "pay" (as one of the possible duty actions) and have introduced "compensate". However, we still have payeeParty as a Party Function and payAmount as a constraint name. So, do we want to alter these to match the switch from "pay" to "compensate"?

Perhaps "compensatedParty" and "compensationAmount"? (Or just "compensation" since the units of compensation might not be numeric, I imagine?)

Regards,

Stuart



The information contained in this communication is intended for the use
of the designated recipients named above. If the reader of this 
communication is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that you have received this communication in error, and that any review,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 
notify The Associated Press immediately by telephone at +1-212-621-1898 
and delete this email. Thank you.
[IP_US_DISC]

msk dccc60c6d2c3a6438f0cf467d9a4938