Thanks for the update Victor....great work!
> a) ODRL actions have been replaced in the latest update by CreativeCommons terms. But the former were class instances (e.g. odrl:distribute) and the latter are OWL classes (e.g. cc:Distribution). How should we proceed?
What options are there?
> b) A license should be a odrl:Set, certainly. Yet, for a newcomer is hard to understand this polysemic word, and I prefer odrl:Policy even if less specific: everybody catches the meaning at a glimpse.
"Set" was used from its mathematical foundation ("a collection of distinct objects").
It was to be used as a general purpose type when you are just making a collection of statements, not asserting an "agreement" or "offer" to any particular party.
Is there a better word?
Since odrl:Policy is its parent class, what is the semantics of an ODRL Policy with type odrl:Policy?
Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 09:53:04 UTC