Re: Combined Permissions and Restrictions in ODRL 2.0: Is this example correct?

On 28 Feb 2012, at 07:02, Myles, Stuart wrote:

> When you say “The relation should be "target"” does that mean that the printingFee asset is the target of the action pay? So, I’m wrong that the payment creates the printing fee, instead the printing fee must be paid by the action? That does make more sense, I think.


Yes, the (target) asset for the Pay action will give the details of what to pay.
(in our examples we use a target asset that is a UBL XML asset)

Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 03:14:36 UTC