- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 19:34:03 +0200
- To: "Dr John O'Hare" <w3c@xrsystems.uk>
- Cc: public-nostr@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+5V6bH3dPeG_rwpxNMnJAqTQgNDq=y=J0y5qFniyWaLw@mail.gmail.com>
ne 10. 8. 2025 v 19:17 odesílatel Dr John O'Hare <w3c@xrsystems.uk> napsal: > Really exciting to see. I'd kinda given up on DID / zk proofs etc; a > couple of years ago to be honest, but this is hugely accessible to my vibe > coding brain. > Cool, hope you find it useful! Report back if you are able to make anything, or want to propose a CG work item. We would be happy to help :) > > On Sunday, 10 August 2025 at 17:59, Melvin Carvalho < > melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > ne 10. 8. 2025 v 18:15 odesílatel Dr John O'Hare <w3c@xrsystems.uk> > napsal: > >> That's super useful thanks Melvin. I think I might try implementing this >> into the back end of my knowledge system. How does the zero relay / point >> to point system work? I think I've only ever used the relays. >> > > It's a proposed spec right now, but I think it will be adopted by the CCG > > https://dcdpr.github.io/data-integrity-schnorr-secp256k1/ > > Just run it through an LLM with questions, and then post back here if > anything is unclear > >> >> Is there code for protocol agnostic credentials around yet? ie, expanding >> on your point about it being cross compatible? >> > > That would be the verifiable credentials stack. It will be widely used, I > think > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verifiable_credentials > >> >> On Saturday, 9 August 2025 at 21:58, Melvin Carvalho < >> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Good news! After a helpful discussion with the W3C Credentials Community >> Group, we’ve aligned on a verification method that works cleanly with >> did:nostr and the Verifiable Credentials stack: >> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/254#issuecomment-3172061021 >> >> I’ve already patched the did:nostr draft to reflect this. >> >> What this unlocks >> >> 1. Production-ready reference implementations >> >> 2. Compatibility with the wider W3C Credentials ecosystem >> >> 3. A straightforward path to issuing industry-standard credentials >> (badges, awards, driver’s licences, etc.) over Nostr >> >> 4. The ability to sign and exchange JSON payloads between Nostr services >> (relays optional) >> >> It’s a nice step up in standards alignment and Nostr functionality. >> >> Many thanks to everyone who weighed in, feedback very welcome! >> >> >> ne 3. 8. 2025 v 19:10 odesílatel Melvin Carvalho < >> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> napsal: >> >>> FYI >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> Od: Will Abramson <wip.abramson@gmail.com> >>> Date: čt 31. 7. 2025 v 18:13 >>> Subject: New Work Item Proposal: Data Integrity BIP340 Cryptosuite >>> To: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org> >>> >>> >>> Hello CCG community, >>> >>> Digital Contract Design in collaboration with Legendary Requirements and >>> Danube Tech are proposing a new CCG Work Item for adoption: >>> https://dcdpr.github.io/data-integrity-schnorr-secp256k1/ >>> >>> See the proposal issue here: >>> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/254 >>> >>> We feel this is important as there are currently no up to date Data >>> Integrity cryptosuites available for the secp256k1 curve, which has wide >>> adoption throughout multiple blockchain ecosystems. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> All the best, >>> Will Abramson >>> >> >> >
Received on Sunday, 10 August 2025 17:34:19 UTC