- From: Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:50:33 -0700
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, public-nextweb@w3.org
Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 18:51:05 UTC
But the polyfills themselves have supported browsers! And prollyfills are completely new features. Do they want to include every old prollyfill? On Jul 26, 2013 11:26 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 26, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > > > caniuse is about whether things already work in browsers. This would be > about documenting p(r)olyfills (and what browsers they worked in). > > Each API they list also contains a "Resources" section that more often > than not has a link to a Polyfill. > > Have a look at any API there: > http://caniuse.com/#feat=matchmedia > http://caniuse.com/#feat=classlist > > And so on…. > > It would create another dimension to caniuse, but if they were up for > it, sure. > > I think we can just send pull requests for the data tables they are using: > https://github.com/fyrd/caniuse > > For example, classlist.json has: > > links:[ { > "url":"https://github.com/eligrey/classList.js", > "title":"Polyfill script" > }] > > > > -- > Marcos Caceres > > > >
Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 18:51:05 UTC