Re: Deliverables Re: TPAC

But the polyfills themselves have supported browsers!

And prollyfills are completely new features. Do they want to include every
old prollyfill?
On Jul 26, 2013 11:26 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Friday, July 26, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
>
> > caniuse is about whether things already work in browsers. This would be
> about documenting p(r)olyfills (and what browsers they worked in).
>
> Each API they list also contains a "Resources" section that more often
> than not has a link to a Polyfill.
>
> Have a look at any API there:
> http://caniuse.com/#feat=matchmedia
> http://caniuse.com/#feat=classlist
>
> And so on….
> > It would create another dimension to caniuse, but if they were up for
> it, sure.
>
> I think we can just send pull requests for the data tables they are using:
> https://github.com/fyrd/caniuse
>
> For example, classlist.json has:
>
> links:[ {
> "url":"https://github.com/eligrey/classList.js",
> "title":"Polyfill script"
> }]
>
>
>
> --
> Marcos Caceres
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 18:51:05 UTC