W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-nextweb@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Deliverables Re: TPAC

From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:56:01 -0700
To: Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE17E8CD.3CD44%stearns@adobe.com>
I talked to Alexis back in February about repurposing caniuse for other
data sets (EPUB3 compatibility was the topic at that time). He said that
in the current state it would be messy, but he was in the middle of a
rewrite that might make it possible to re-use the presentation layer. I
don't know how much time he's had to spend on the rewrite since, but I've
pinged him to find out.

Thanks,

Alan

On 7/26/13 8:34 AM, "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:

>caniuse is about whether things already work in browsers. This would be
>about documenting p(r)olyfills (and what browsers they worked in). It
>would create another dimension to caniuse, but if they were up for it,
>sure.
>
>Yehuda Katz
>(ph) 718.877.1325
>
>
>On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Marcos Caceres
><w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>On Friday, July 26, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2013 5:06 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com
>>(mailto:w3c@marcosc.com)> wrote:
>> I think we have general agreement that a caniuse style repo under the
>>github org and on orolkfill org is a good idea, for one.
>
>
>Is there any reason to not use caniuse? Why start another one when we
>could just contribute to caniuse?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 15:56:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:54 UTC