- From: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:40:49 -0700
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-nextweb@w3.org" <public-nextweb@w3.org>
Marcos: I'm glad you showed this as I just committed a Boolean test fixture. I also used AMD. But we have different approaches (I'm using require and you use define). I put my test in "web-idl-type-boolean-tests.js" in the /test directory. I think my pattern is a little lighter than yours and might make test writing a bit easier? I'm happy contribute to the test writing as maybe that's a way to get blind taste tests since I didn't write the implementations? Maybe that will create a cleaner validation process of the implementations this way. Thoughts? On 1/14/13 9:18 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > > >On Monday, January 14, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > >> It isn't a stupid question at all - as I said, they are reworking >>grunt. Your version was the latest until just a few days ago and there >>are significant breaking changes including this one. > > >Love it :) Ok, so, I'm going to continue manually linting and testing in >the browser for now (just to not be held up while that transition goes >on). > >About the tests, I'm still working on them but here is where I'm heading >with them (example as an AMD module): > >http://pastebin.com/AxaAt6eD > >This file sits under test/modules/WebIDL.Boolean-tests.js > >This makes the tests completely self contained modules that load in their >own dependencies - which is _really_ nice, IMO. > >What I like about this structure is that it allows for pasting in the >spec text to test(assertion, Š); > >Let me know what you guys think! > > >-- >Marcos Caceres > > >
Received on Monday, 14 January 2013 16:41:29 UTC