Re: Merged a lot

That's correct.

Grunt 0.3.x had the config file as grunt.js. Grunt 0.4.x is going to use
Gruntfile.js. As well there are significant changes to the internals (qunit,
uglify, jshint) that are breaking at the moment. In order to use Grunt on
the 0.4.x path you will need to be sure to update your local Grunt:

npm uninstall -g grunt
npm install -g grunt-cli

Once you have this setup, our project will hold all the necessary modules.
Having said that: I strongly urge us to continue on this path as Grunt is
becoming quite feature rich and IMO the changes that are in play are "good"
and we should stick it out.



From:  Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date:  Monday, January 14, 2013 9:11 AM
To:  Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc:  Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>, "public-nextweb@w3.org"
<public-nextweb@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: Merged a lot




On Jan 14, 2013 11:09 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Clint,
> Stupid question, but my grunt doesn't like "GruntFile.js" Š it's looking for
'grunt.js' so I get an grunt.js file not found error.
>
> Am I out of date or something?
>
>
> --
> Marcos Caceres
>
>
> On Monday, January 14, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
> > Yeas that is just what I was suggesting.
> > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com <http://hitchjs.com>
(http://hitchjs.com)
> > On Jan 14, 2013 10:48 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com
(mailto:clint.hill@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > It was a git pull ­ so just an update.
> > >
> > > I had to make modifications to both grunt-contrib-qunit and
grunt-contrib-uglify, due to the Grunt API changes.
> > >
> > > As a stopgap I'm going to commit node_modules. This way we all have the
same stuff. Once Grunt becomes stabilized we can drop them from the tree.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com (mailto:bkardell@gmail.com)>
> > > Date: Monday, January 14, 2013 8:36 AM
> > > To: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com (mailto:clint.hill@gmail.com)>
> > > Cc: "public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)"
<public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > > Subject: Re: Merged a lot
> > >
> > > Did it get you node_modules or are you using what I sent you? In other
words, did you try a fresh one or just an update?
> > > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com <http://hitchjs.com>
(http://hitchjs.com)
> > > On Jan 14, 2013 10:26 AM, "Clint Hill" <clint.hill@gmail.com
(mailto:clint.hill@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > I pulled the latest this morning and the build was just fine.
> > > >
> > > > From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com (mailto:bkardell@gmail.com)>
> > > > Date: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:09 PM
> > > > To: "public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)"
<public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > > > Subject: Merged a lot
> > > > Resent-From: <public-nextweb@w3.org (mailto:public-nextweb@w3.org)>
> > > > Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:10:05 +0000
> > > >
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > I've merged Marco's pull request... Despite the fact that all of the
issues say "implement" which Marcos clearly has accomplished, I didn't follow
through and close them because a couple of them had open comments/notes...
Francois, can you just quickly take a look through the ones where Marcos had a
question and maybe determine if you would like to make note of it, open a new
issue on it or whatever? I don't want to lose the open questions...
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to close these out and get some test suite running them thatso
that we can have the edge/fringe sort of debates and have something we can
safely rework if necessary... The current tests only check that an item exists
and, well - the test harnessing itself seems broken to me.
> > > >
> > > > To that end: can someone verify that the build is borked? I was unable
to run it ... jshint which complains for me on the webidl file iteself, not
anything recently added because of the Function constructor and use of
__proto__...
> > > >
> > > > I was able to put them into a local server and manually make the
adjustments/copies that the build work and things worked fine though...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com <http://hitchjs.com>
(http://hitchjs.com/)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
It isn't a stupid question at all - as I said, they are reworking grunt.
Your version was the latest until just a few days ago and there are
significant breaking changes including this one.

Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com <http://hitchjs.com>