- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:45:04 -0400
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel@privowny.com>, Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org>
- Cc: public-new-work@w3.org, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
On 9/24/2019 12:43 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > So in practice, all Groups already have a very powerful review power, that should render better in the Process. I cc:ed Jeff because I think formal objections should be extended, in Process Section 3.3.2, to Working Groups, based on a consensual decision or even vote (hey, we would finally use votes in WGs, isn't that cool?). Only "individual(s) may register a Formal Objection to a decision" for the time being. Thanks for this input. Changes to the W3C process are handled in the W3-process Community Group. The best way to get attention to a new idea is to raise an issue [1]. [1] https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2019 12:45:07 UTC