[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: CSS 1 as Superseded Recommendation'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Call for Review:
CSS 1 as Superseded Recommendation' (Advisory Com‌mit‌te‌e) for
Mozilla Foundation by David Baron.

> 
> ---------------------------------
> Decision 
> 
> ----
> Regarding the proposal to supersede this Recommendation, my
> organization:
> 
> 

 * (x) supports republishing this Recommendation as Superseded
Recommendation.
 * ( ) does not support to republish this Recommendation as Superseded
Recommendation for the reasons included below [Formal Objection].
These are the Recommendations my organization supports as Obsolete
Recommendations, for the following reasons: 


> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Other Comments
> 
> ----
> Please add here any other comments you have.
> 
> 
Comments: 
It's not clear to me if we should be using the Superseded process for
Recommendations that are superseded by another W3C Recommendation of the
same name with a higher version number; that wasn't how I imagined it being
used when it was added to the process.  I understood that addition as being
to remedy objections in
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/101147/cors-obs-2017-09/results to
obsoleting CORS because it was superseded by a specification of a different
name, at a different organization.  This seems to me like a lot of AC
ballots for something that's relatively obvious, and that should be an
implicit part of the process rather than something that requires a lot of
AC ballots.

> 
> These answers were last modified on 26 May 2018 at 05:59:04 U.T.C.
> by David Baron
> 
Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/101147/css1-sup/ until 2018-06-21.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Saturday, 26 May 2018 06:00:04 UTC