W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-new-work@w3.org > February 2018

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: WOFF File Format 2.0 is a W3C Proposed Recommendation'

From: David Baron via WBS Mailer <sysbot+wbs@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:39:02 +0000
To: public-new-work@w3.org
Message-Id: <wbs-d424610d68317658177aa63e63cf4b81@w3.org>
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Call for Review:
WOFF File Format 2.0 is a W3C Proposed Recommendation' (Advisory Committee)
for Mozilla Foundation by David Baron.

Regarding the "WOFF 2.0" specification, the reviewer  supports publication
as a W3C Recommendation as is.

The reviewer's organization:
   - produces products addressed by this specification
   - expects to produce content conforming to this specification.
   - expects to use products conforming to this specification.


Comments about products related to these specifications:
   We shipped support for WOFF2 in Firefox 39, which shipped in July of
2015.  See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/39



General comments:
   The implementation report and test results look quite good:
https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/WOFF2/Implementation.html  However, the decoder
test results show a single test "validation-off-012" with no passing
implementation: https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/WOFF2/Decoder_results.html

Since the implementation report explains the User Agent non passing tests
"The remaining nonpassing tests are believed to be fixed by ...", it would
be good if the implementation report also explained why
"validation-off-012" appears to have no passing implementation (is it an
optional feature? waiting for libraries to be updated? etc.)


Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/PR-woff2-2018/ until 2018-02-18.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 21:39:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:30:33 UTC