Daniel, I have just made an update to the proposed charter text (still in the separate branch[1]): - separated the rec-track and non-rec-track documents in the list of input documents - I have also added a reference to HTML, CSS, and SVG in the list of input documents with some general text on why those documents appear there Are these o.k. with you? Thanks Ivan [1] https://rawgit.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/vivlio-di-objections/index.html > On 25 Apr 2017, at 11:10, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > > Le 24/04/2017 à 21:04, Ivan Herman a écrit : >> Daniel, >> >> I have just realized that I may have misunderstood what you said about rec track input documents. Do you mean to separate those documents that are either recs or are on rec-track by another WG from those that are either notes or drafts for notes? If that is what you mean, then I agree that would be helpful and I am happy doing it (tomorrow...) > > Yes, that was exactly my suggestion. > > </Daniel> > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 10:43:53 UTC