Re: [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: Publishing Working Group Charter'

On Apr 18, 2017, at 20:17, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Florian,
> 

Thanks for the quick answer.

> for the purpose of a better administration, I would propose to cut the responses to two, because you had two very distinct comments. This mail is exclusively on your second comment (obviously, the first comment requires more discussions).

I agree it's easier that way.

> I believe that each Working Group has, in fact, the possibility to re-group deliverables the way you describe. But it is indeed better to spell it out.
> 
> For obvious reasons I have not changed the charter draft, as references from the WBS form, yet. However, I maintain a "shadow" version of the draft which already contains this change (with a slight re-formulation of your original text):
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2017/04/publ-wg-charter/shadow.html#deliverables
> 
> Is this fine with you?

Yes, this looks good. Thank you for the fix.

—Florian Rivoal