- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:38:08 +0100
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- CC: public-new-work@w3.org
Hi David, It's true that the Best Practices document will not define any new technical standards, but it will present a series of dos and don'ts that can be followed. Examples of where we've done this before include the Mobile Web Best Practices [1] and WCAG [2]. The intention is that, like WCAG, it will be something that can be cited in official policies. The scope of the WG covers scientific data, cultural heritage data and government data and it's the last of these in particular that means we need to have something that has been through an open standards process that can support government policies. CR exit criteria for the document will be that each best practice is cited in at least two official policies (from any of the three sectors). This is a target I am confident in reaching, not least because parallel to the WG there will be a European Commission funded project that includes parters from 25 countries who are all committed to writing such policies, i.e. "this is how you implement the W3C Data on the Web Best Practices in Austria, France, Lithuania, Slovakia etc. etc." From an applications developer perspective, the aim is to improve the predictability of data on the Web in terms of formats, metadata and reliability. The CSV on the Web WG is a key part of that as it's about making tabular data more interoperable, but the Best Practices is where it will likely say "you should provide metadata for your CSV files thus..." I'll be at TPAC if you want to go deeper into this. HTH Phil. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/ On 18/10/2013 01:08, Ian Jacobs wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2013, at 6:31 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:42 , Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group: >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter.html >> >> I guess I am a little puzzled that this is a WG, and that a 'best practices' document (which would not seem to therefore have normative text, by implication) would be on the Rec track: >> >> "Deliverable: Data on the Web Best Practices (Recommendation)" >> >> >> Can anyone enlighten me? > > [Adding Phil Archer for assistance] > > Ian > >> >> David Singer >> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. >> >> >> > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 08:38:45 UTC