- From: Kai Hendry <hendry@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:40:28 +0100
- To: public-mwts@w3.org
Reply to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mwts/2008Mar/0011.html I still think it's too difficult without looking at the source to tell which tests have failed. Saying I have three red squares doesn't tell much. Ok I see you've added numbers, great. I noticed my ipod touch failed 3. The SVG tests and the n-th CSS3 selector test. Firstly I think we should recognise the Iphone as the baseline. Having the iphone fail any tests right now is a little silly IMO... Comments about individual tests: iframe inclusing of XHTML content Why? I am sick of XHTML and when I see this test's title somehow verifying its existence again on mobile ... XHTML is a huge waste of time. CSS3 selectors Nice, but since desktop UAs fail this one... a bit of "getting ahead of ourselves"? CSS Media Queries Good! :) CSS2 min-width Verify what iphone is doing here. Can't find Apple's docs on this right now. Static SVG Dynamic SVG I think we can live without SVG for this test in the light that the iphone doesn't support it. Transparent PNG OK the data: URI scheme Encouraging people to do inline stuff with data:... Is that really a good thing? Isn't it better to test for gzip support or something. Worried about encouraging bad authoring practices. XMLHTTPRequest Yes! Maybe some more basic JS tests? The canvas element Comes under the SVG category for me. Nice to have, not required... HTTPS GOOD. :) Though which CAs are verified? Is it fair to give Thawte all the business as usual? :) I think it is very important to test for Internet connection purity. Checking that perhaps there isn't some sort of proxy rewriting requests type stuff. Know what I mean? Maybe some sort of speed test would be good. On desktops it's very apparent what the difference is between 56k and broadband. Though less so for mobiles. contenteditable Not sure about this. Can you offer any more argumentation? I don't see the use case. Will try be on a call one day. :) Keep up the great work!
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 15:41:49 UTC