- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:51:45 +0100
- To: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
- Cc: public-mwts@w3.org
Hi Curt, Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 12:30 -0600, Curt Arnold a écrit : > You may be more interested in the self-hosted production which takes > the tests and converts them to a corresponding set of HTML, XHTML or > SVG documents. Each document runs a test script on load and then > modifies its document model to report either success or failure. The > WebKit project (open-source Safari) uses the self hosted productions > in its unit tests. > > To build test self-hosted tests: > > ant dom1-core-gen-selfhtml Thanks, that's extremely useful indeed! I'm looking into the self-hosted files right now, and after some simple testing, I think I'll proceed and put them somewhere on the W3C server. > The self-hosted productions were never endorsed > by the DOM WG and the results were never fully compared to those run > using JSUnit. Could you comment a bit more on this? Is there any reason to think the self-hosted version may be less reliable than the JSUnit-based one, or is it simply that nobody had the time to make a proper comparison between these two test harness? Thanks again, Dom
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 08:52:24 UTC