Re: new charter version

Hi Phillip,

thanks for your review. Yes the term 'Note' is a W3C term explained in 
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#q78

Cheers
Steph

Le 26/01/2010 17:41, Olla, Phillip a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I have read the new charter and I agree with the approach.
>
> Is there a reason we are using the term 'Notes'. I don't believe the word notes goes far enough to describe what we intend to produce for each of the section.  This is just a thought, if there is a compelling reason why we want to adopt this term, then please ignore this comment.
>
> Regards
>
> Phillip
>
>
>
> Dr Phillip Olla
> Endowed Phillips Chair of Management
> School of Business
> Madonna University
> 36600 Schoolcraft rd
> Livonia
> 48150
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org on behalf of Chevrollier, N.G. (Nicolas)
> Sent: Tue 1/26/2010 08:27 AM
> To: adesina iluyemi; Renjish Kumar
> Cc: Stephane Boyera; public-mw4d@w3.org
> Subject: RE: new charter version
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just to make sure I understand:
> - we will work domain based and collect information on the different
> topics (adoption, business model, ...)
> - we will present the notes topic based (maybe 1 sub-section on what is
> general and 1 sub-section on each domain)
>
> If that is the case, I would rather go for a presentation per domain as
> well and a general note about generalization.
>
> But this is only a matter on how we organize the note. In any case we
> have to start collecting per domain.
>
> Best,
>
> Nicolas
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mw4d-request@w3.org]
> On
>> Behalf Of adesina iluyemi
>> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 6:02 PM
>> To: Renjish Kumar
>> Cc: Stephane Boyera; public-mw4d@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: new charter version
>>
>> I support these suggestions of Interest Groups. 3, 4, 5, specifically
>> interests me
>>
>> Adesina
>>
>> On 19/01/2010, Renjish Kumar<renjish.kumar@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Stephane, All,
>>>
>>> The charter doc has captured different dimensions of MW4D,
>>> namely Application domains, Tools, Impact Analysis, Business Models
> and
>>> Service Adoption Methodologies quite well.  Thanks.
>>>
>>> May I also suggest that we include a statement somewhere (perhaps in
> the
>>> Approach section?) in the doc emphasizing that the primary objective
> is
>> to
>>> identify the "best practices" based on empirical evidences and not
> to
>> invent
>>> new methodologies or models. The "Group note on MW4D tools
> landscape"
>> seems
>>> like an exception here, so the question is whether we can do this in
> the
>>> stipulated time period of this group?
>>>
>>> Secondly, which Group note will include the following (mentioned in
> the
>>> Approach section):
>>>
>>> "Then, in a second phase, after having studied few domains, the
> group
>> will
>>> identify cross-sector similarities, and potential generalizations
> that
>> could
>>> provide solutions across different domains."
>>>
>>> Would this also be in the first Group note?
>>>
>>> The Group note descriptions cover the scope briefly quite well. To
> make
>>> their titles to reflect the scope accurately, I feel it will be
> proper
>> to
>>> add the key word MW4D wherever appropriate. I mean the following:
>>>
>>>
>>>     1. An Interest Group Note on Domain-Specific Challenges and
>>> *MW4D*Solutions
>>>     2. An Interest Group Note on *MW4D* Tools Landscape
>>>     3. An Interest Group Note on *MW4D* Impact Analysis Methodologies
> and
>>>     Results
>>>     4. An Interest Group Note on *MW4D* Business Models
>>>     5. An Interest Group Note on *MW4D Service* Adoption
> Methodologies
>>>
>>>
>>>   More when we discuss the scope of each note in detail.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Renjish
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Boyera<boyera@w3.org>
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> Following our discussions yesterday i updated the charter at
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/01/MW4Dcharter2.html along the lines we
>> discussed:
>>>>
>>>> *mentionned social networks in the work on tools
>>>> *added a section 1.1 approach describing the bottom-up approach we
>>>> discussed. Also mentionned it in the timeline section
>>>> *added a section on adoptin methodologies and added a corresponding
>>>> deliverable. Nicolas feel free to propose a better description
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if i missed something.
>>>> All comments are welcome before teh end of this week so that i can
>> start
>>>> the process of validation next week
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Steph
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Stephane Boyera         stephane@w3.org
>>>> W3C                             +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08
>>>> BP 93                           fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22
>>>> F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
>>>> France
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adesina Iluyemi
>> mHealth Innovator/Consultant
>> SINSEPROD LLP, UK
>> Sustainable eHealth/Telemedicine in Africa
>> Centre for Healthcare Modelling&  Informatics
>> University of Portsmouth
>> T: +44 (0)23 9284 6784
>> M: +44 (0)79 5602 6010
>> Skype:innovatoris
>> W: http://www.linkedin.com/in/adesina1974
>
> This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html
>
>
>
>

-- 
Stephane Boyera		stephane@w3.org
W3C				+33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08
BP 93				fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22
F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex,		
France

Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 17:19:57 UTC