- From: Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:29:24 +0100
- To: "Chevrollier, N.G. (Nicolas)" <nicolas.chevrollier@tno.nl>
- CC: public-mw4d@w3.org
Hi Nicolas, > Just to make sure I understand: > - we will work domain based and collect information on the different > topics (adoption, business model, ...) yes > - we will present the notes topic based (maybe 1 sub-section on what is > general and 1 sub-section on each domain) we don't need to define the structure of the note yet, but in my mind, i would be very surprised that the logical structure of the note on e.g. business model will be based on domain. So we agreed ot start on the collection of evidences based on a domain approach, but then how to classify the different models, this is another story, and we probably should not discuss that now, till we have at least 2 domains. > If that is the case, I would rather go for a presentation per domain as > well and a general note about generalization. Again, in my own personnal experience, as a technical expert, i had the opoprtunity to work in many different domains. Each time i talked to specialists in their domains, they are convinced that their issues and solutions are very specific. In practice, i usually found that barriers, and solutions are very similar from one domain to another. So as i understand there is no real consensus on this, i propose that, as agreed we start with a domain approach, and then if after having studied few domains we find out that there is no commonalities, then we would naturally go for a presentation by domain. If we find many similarities, then we will go for a presentation per topic. Cheers Stephane -- Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org W3C +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08 BP 93 fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22 F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 16:29:29 UTC