- From: <tadao@serasa.com.br>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:54:24 -0300
- To: boyera@w3.org
- Cc: <Lauri.K.Hirvonen@nokia.com>, gillis.bill@gmail.com, janusz@eumx.net, nadeem@cewit.org.in, public-mw4d@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9638F84F.BBF06712-ON03257475.00343B77-03257475.00366B82@serasa.com.br>
Hi,
First of all, congratulation to W3C to this initiative, specially to the
opportunity to watch the congress here at São Paulo, Brasil. I am sure
that this type of discution will break quicly some barrers and the
technology will help the developmtent of world, maily developing
countries. I live in Brazil and we have two distinct scenarios: one is
similar to developed countries, where we use high tech devices (iPhone,
powerfull smart phones, etc...) to navigate, to make digital signature,
to send and receive e-mails, and so on. In other hand, we have the
majority of users with simple devices in a pre-paid model. This model
limit the usage only because the idea is to receive call no to make call.
Just to put more pepper/salt in this discution, it is important to
consider the business model used in countries such as Brazil and Mexico
(in fact, i believe that is in all Latin America). Here, most part of
mobile devices is pre-paid and have limited access to internet (not ont
the band but the traffic).
As a company, we are trying to use mobile devices in two ways: to make a
broadcast of information (SMS) and star simple application (simple
navigations), but we are having problems to deal with more complex apps.
Thus, considering the use of this device to navigate on Internet is not
totally real or acceptable. I do not know how countries from Africa (that
I believe has a similar business model, considering economic aspects) deal
with this. Does the mobile user only to receive (acting as a passive
device) or it is really used to navigate (acting as active device)?
I hope I could help in this discution.
Thanks,
Lauri.K.Hirvonen@nokia.com
Enviado Por: public-mw4d-request@w3.org
RAMAL:
27/06/2008 06:10
Para: <gillis.bill@gmail.com>, <nadeem@cewit.org.in>
cc: <boyera@w3.org>, <janusz@eumx.net>, <public-mw4d@w3.org>
Assunto: RE: Teleconferences
I have been visiting several "developing countries" and the problem in
most of them is, that they don't have good Internet connections.
The country might have only Internet connection via satellite -data links.
Those are slow and bandwidth limited. It means only few users can have
access same time to Internet from that country. Often mobile phone
networks are working quite well. But to use mobile phone to access
Internet has the same limitation as the operator has to use the same
satellite data link to get to Internet.
We in the western countries are spoiled with good optical fiber networks
providing wonderful fast Internet services with reasonably low cost.
In many developing countries they don't have the optical cable connections
to the Internet.
Often it is the university in the developing country which have the
Internet connection and it is controlled who can use it.
This is improving but slowly.
Br. Lauri
From: public-mw4d-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mw4d-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of ext Bill Gillis
Sent: 26 June, 2008 17:17
To: Nadeem Akhtar
Cc: Stephane Boyera; Janusz Lukasiak; public-mw4d@w3.org
Subject: Re: Teleconferences
Nadeem,
This is an important observation. It is possible that this is another
good example of a mismatch between cultural context and ICT application.
The context for many 'developing countries' is
1) limited communications budgets
2) English is often a second, third or even fourth language
3) Often there is a strong tradition of personal face-to-face
communication. Conference calls are not necessarily a part of that
tradition.
Stephane, I do not mean this be critical..but when one enters the W3C page
to sign up to learn about becoming an official member, it states that it
is required to participate regularly and accept the cost of participating
in an international conference call conducted in English. Also it is
necessary to read through and agree to several statements written in
rather complicated legal language that can be difficult even for a native
English speaker.
I can only guess, but these may be potential unintended barriers to
participation. It would be useful to hear from those who are from
'developing counties'. I may be making incorrect assumptions as to the
importance of cost, language and tradition as barriers to "official
membership".
We came across the same challenge of lack of participation when we
attempted to encourage regular 'conference calls' among African university
colleagues discussing opportunties to utilize ICT for higher education
collaboration. In that case, there was better participation when we
changed meetings to use Internet chat rather than voice conference.
Ciao,
Bill
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Nadeem Akhtar <nadeem@cewit.org.in>
wrote:
Stephane,
It's ironic that the list of official participants in MW4D group has
hardly
anyone from 'developing' countries! Maybe the call for participants needs
to
be circulated wider.
Regards,
Nadeem
Attachments
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 09:59:09 UTC