- From: Janusz Lukasiak <janusz@eumx.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:45:36 +0200
- To: public-mw4d@w3.org
More semantic nit-picking: The 'PROVIDERS' box a) talks about _contents_ providers, not _service_ providers (network operators, telcos &c). To avoid confusion 'Contents providers' should be used. Even then this requires further narrowing. Everybody who publishes (or hosts) anything of the web is 'contents provider'. We have to make the type of contents we're talking about clear. b) says "The three key providers of services are NGOs, government, and entrepreneurs/ the private sector". This does not leave anybody out, so what's the point of stating the obvious? The "those who currently lack access to health, education, banking, etc" phrase is IMHO misleading. It's not the access to health as such (i.e. doctors, drugs, hospitals) we're talking about. Ditto education and banking (we will not provide schools or cashpoints). I guess the intended meaning is 'access to information about....'. But then specifying what kind of information 'underserved communities' should have access to is pointless (or downright silly: why not 'locust/tornado warnings' or 'fish/coffee prices'?) May be a definition of 'underserved community' will suffice here ? Janusz
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2008 14:46:16 UTC