- From: Jeremy Sawruk <jeremy.sawruk@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:04:20 -0500
- To: Michael Good <mgood@makemusic.com>
- Cc: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANRG7pRbd6YhQxYnyt==keq1JBfL32ivvUY9+RiSjra3=wvZtw@mail.gmail.com>
Yes, that is exactly what I had in mind. I also think that putting the issue numbers at the end of the issue is more readable. On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Michael Good <mgood@makemusic.com> wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > Thank you for this suggestion. We did keep the link to the complete list > of issues addressed in 3.1 at the end of the document. I believe you are > suggesting that we link individual changes to individual issues. Daniel had > suggested something similar. > > How would you suggest these links look in the change list? Would you want > something like: > > > - The except-voice element is used to specify a combination of slash > notation and regular notation. (Issue 231 > <https://github.com/w3c/musicxml/issues/231>) > > > Or did you have some other formatting in mind? I saw another spec that had > the issue numbers at the start of each bullet item, but that seems less > readable to me. > > Best regards, > Michael > > On Dec 5, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Jeremy Sawruk <jeremy.sawruk@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thank you for making this report. I think this is an extremely useful > document, and something that should be included with every release. > > I have one minor suggestion: > > Link to related Github issues. This will help track changes, as well as > link to source code, discussion, and other relevant information. This way > we can have both linking to technical discussion as well as user-friendly > descriptions. Re-reading Peter's email, he felt that linking to Github was > insufficient, and I agree. However, I think it would be helpful to have > both. > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Michael Good <mgood@makemusic.com> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> A new version of the MusicXML 3.1 Community Group Report incorporating >> Peter Deutsch’s request for a full change list is now available for review >> at https://w3c.github.io/musicxml/. >> >> Any further reviews this week would be most appreciated. The current plan >> is to create the v3.1 tag in GitHub later today so the schema link starts >> working, and then publish the report early next week. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Michael Good >> VP of MusicXML Technologies >> MakeMusic, Inc. >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2017 21:04:47 UTC