- From: cecilio <s.cecilio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 16:44:57 +0200
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEhx-i96D9GK+rpyid8vV1b21++3z2MV1hTeC_Wc+RHgUoCLDQ@mail.gmail.com>
In the scope of the profile <score content="cwmn" profile="standard"> there are measure-free scores. The typical examples are many pieces from Erik Satie. It has been suggested that for regularity of the schema, measure-free scores or passages be treated as consisting of either a single big measure or of smaller measures with hidden barlines and time signatures. Two ideas on this: 1. In my opinion the MNX standard must choose between using a single big measure or using smaller measures with hidden barlines and time signature. One of the MNX objectives is to enforce programs to create semantically correct MNX files. Leaving the decision on how to encode measure-free scores to each MNX writer/exporter will provide unnecessary freedom and this will introducing unnecessary complexity in MNX parsers and could create unexpected future problems. 2. Although a 'hidden' attribute attached to an element can be useful for a particular application, I dislike the idea of describing the semantics using hidden objects. The attribute 'hidden' has to do with appearance, not with semantics and, therefore, the objects composing the music score should be described in MNX without having to resort on appearance attributes. Therefore, my suggestion is to treat CWMN measure-free scores as consisting of a single big measure, somehow marked as 'structural' to distinguish these structural measures from regular ones, i.e. to treat the structural ones as 'hidden' ;-) Cecilio
Received on Saturday, 1 April 2017 14:45:29 UTC