- From: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:13:49 -0400
- To: James Ingram <j.ingram@netcologne.de>
- Cc: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+ojG-aboQ52AUgta2GVLWWphWL0jLMS1KaZAzD47QG1q_xaUA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi James, I moved your definition to a new section called "Meta Notation" that asks about these kinds of abstract definitions of notation. It includes (with attribution) the one you just proposed. I do not think we are ready to say what notations are or are not in scope yet and so I took out the assertion that all such Notations are in scope. That's something we can all discuss. I think the proposed definition raises some very big questions about what notation is. That's great, but I am not sure that the answers -- if they are available -- will take us to a useful place. The definition seems so broad as to include literally anything. You are saying (I think) we should cover any visual graphic that describes timed musical events, but have placed no constraints on what those events are, or how the time dimension itself is treated. Furthermore, it's not clear that "the graphic" in your definition always exists. An encoding should be able to represent musical data in accepted types like CMN without having to refer to any visual instantiation. This definition would burden all encoders with having to encode a visual aspect that they in many cases do not need or want. What is the advantage of adopting this definition? If the answer is, "it means we include all notated musical works in the past and future", then my view is that you should focus on a separate SVG-based solution that appeals to this breadth of visual possibilities. Such a solution will be completely general, but not very useful to those of us who need to work with semantic musical data in core notational idioms. Best, . . . . . ...Joe Joe Berkovitz President Noteflight LLC +1 978 314 6271 49R Day Street Somerville MA 02144 USA "Bring music to life" www.noteflight.com On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:01 PM, James Ingram <j.ingram@netcologne.de> wrote: > Hi All, > > The edit I just made to the Music Notation Use Cases document proposes > that all Performable Notations should be in scope. > A Performable Notation is one in which an instant of performed time maps > to one or more symbols in the graphic. > > Please discuss. Thanks. > > all the best, > James > -- > http://james-ingram-act-two.de > https://github.com/notator >
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 21:14:20 UTC