- From: James Ingram <j.ingram@netcologne.de>
 - Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:02:03 +0200
 - To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
 - Cc: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
 - Message-ID: <570B842B.2040103@netcologne.de>
 
Hi Joe, all,
I've been investigating the 2004 MPEG-4 Symbolic Music Representation 
Use Cases:
The home page for MPEG-4 SMR is at:
http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-4/symbolic-music-representation
SMR was going to be part of MPEG-4, but I don't see it mentioned 
anywhere in the white papers at.
http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/white-papers
Has it been dropped? As far as I can see, they are now only looking at 
the synchronisation of subtitles in videos.
My records include a list of the 2004 test cases that required diagrams, 
and (where possible) implementations using /capella 2004/. This list 
does not include the trivial cases, but it does include some interesting 
remarks (see attachment) .
I think the lesson to be learned, is that any future standard must be 
able to cope with everything today's standard editors (/capella/, 
/Sibelius/, /Finale/, etc.) can do, plus some more. I also think it 
should be made easy for such programs to implement any new standard 
(otherwise the standard is going to be ignored).
All such programs can print, so I think it should be fairly 
straightforward for them to export SVG, if they don't already.
===========================
Two new Use Case proposals:
MC11: /Composer of a multimedia work wants to write a score that 
synchronises sound and vision./
C wants to synchronise the sound with the light.This relates to MC0 
("digital encoding" is not restricted to sound), and to MC1 (the C of 
the sounds need not be the same as the C of the lighting.)
and:
ED5: /Instructor wants to use an interactive //Shenker analysis//diagram.
/
All the best,
James
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: Test_Case_Diagram_List.pdf
 
Received on Monday, 11 April 2016 11:02:40 UTC