- From: James Ingram <j.ingram@netcologne.de>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:02:03 +0200
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Cc: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Message-ID: <570B842B.2040103@netcologne.de>
Hi Joe, all, I've been investigating the 2004 MPEG-4 Symbolic Music Representation Use Cases: The home page for MPEG-4 SMR is at: http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-4/symbolic-music-representation SMR was going to be part of MPEG-4, but I don't see it mentioned anywhere in the white papers at. http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/white-papers Has it been dropped? As far as I can see, they are now only looking at the synchronisation of subtitles in videos. My records include a list of the 2004 test cases that required diagrams, and (where possible) implementations using /capella 2004/. This list does not include the trivial cases, but it does include some interesting remarks (see attachment) . I think the lesson to be learned, is that any future standard must be able to cope with everything today's standard editors (/capella/, /Sibelius/, /Finale/, etc.) can do, plus some more. I also think it should be made easy for such programs to implement any new standard (otherwise the standard is going to be ignored). All such programs can print, so I think it should be fairly straightforward for them to export SVG, if they don't already. =========================== Two new Use Case proposals: MC11: /Composer of a multimedia work wants to write a score that synchronises sound and vision./ C wants to synchronise the sound with the light.This relates to MC0 ("digital encoding" is not restricted to sound), and to MC1 (the C of the sounds need not be the same as the C of the lighting.) and: ED5: /Instructor wants to use an interactive //Shenker analysis//diagram. / All the best, James
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: Test_Case_Diagram_List.pdf
Received on Monday, 11 April 2016 11:02:40 UTC