- From: Knut Nergaard <knut.nergaard@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:59:28 +0300
- To: "public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org" <public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 07:22:22 UTC
Den 30. sep. 2015 kl. 16:29 skrev "James Sutton" <jrs@jmsutton.co.uk>: > 3. SMuFL > I'm not clear why the MusicXML standard needs to be coupled to a font mapping standard. Wouldn't it be simpler for each standard to stand alone? From a font developer standpoint, I second this, and in light of the differing fields of knowledge and issues constituting the MusicXML and SMuFL communities, I would think it would be appropriate with different sub-groups/mailing lists. I for one have questions and suggestions related specifically to SMuFL, most of which I think would be of no immediate interest to the MusicXML community. Knut Nergaard
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 07:22:22 UTC