- From: <mogens@lundholm.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 10:44:10 +0100
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5639D36A.7050506@lundholm.org>
Thanks to Andrew for the Raindrop-example. Interesting to see more examples. Also if there are MusicXML files for the tunes. The Raindrop-prelude is interesting because it is intuitive, while the correct written notes are difficult to read - if the attached file is right. Mogens PS: I get more and more convinced that the idea of making <duration> a total would make notes unambiguous. There will be some preconditions. I think I can make a mathematical proof. PS: Midi is ambiguous - due to the division there will always be small differences in the delta-values. The delta must be considered rational numbers - like floating point. Also other values differ with minor changes. And much more .... On 2015-11-02 17:59, Joe Berkovitz wrote: > Andrew, thanks for sharing this extremely useful example (Don Byrd is > an old collaborator and advisor of mine, by the way). I think this is > a perfect way to frame one of the key questions about use cases that > confronts this group. > > ... On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Andrew Hankinson <andrew.hankinson@gmail.com <mailto:andrew.hankinson@gmail.com>> wrote: > > .... > If you want to build a printable representation, a better option > is to use SVG or Postscript. Or, if you want an unambiguous timing > model, use MIDI or OSC. > >
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: Raindrop.jpg
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2015 09:44:44 UTC