- From: Adrian Holovaty <adrian@holovaty.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:17:26 +0100
- To: public-music-notation-contrib@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 17:17:55 UTC
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Andreas Wenger <andi.xenoage@googlemail.com> wrote: > But a test suite in this style (MusicXML input and expected result image) > seems to be perfect for me to measure quality. What tests/benchmarks do the > other MusicXML engravers use? > For Soundslice, we have an extensive internal test suite that tests for regressions each time we improve the engraving engine. It takes screenshots and compares them to the baseline (correct) versions. I wrote about the infrastructure here: http://www.holovaty.com/writing/automated-screenshot-tests/ I would be happy to make a freely available repository of MusicXML tests, rendered with our engine. Sure, we're proprietary, but our rendering is pretty solid and the only proprietary bit would be the rendering engine, anyway -- not the screenshots or MusicXML files themselves. Adrian
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 17:17:55 UTC