- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:37:32 +0100
- To: David Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- CC: MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5155991C.5010208@kosek.cz>
Hi Dave, on the last telcon I have been tasked to "refresh" and try to move forward some issues. Could you please implemented changes below into proposed ITS RDF Ontology. Thanks, Jirka On 25.2.2013 9:04, MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft] > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/119 > > Raised by: Felix Sasaki > On product: MLW-LT Standard Draft > > Dave started an ITS RDF Ontology. See > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/ITS-RDF_mapping#Ontology_.28DRAFT.29 > This is useful for the NIF conversion. > > There was an offline discussion about this, including Dave, Leroy, Sebastian and I. > > Some thoughts about the ontology current at > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/ITS-RDF_mapping#Ontology_.28DRAFT.29 > > - the ontology uses various RDF classes that are not defined, e.g. "itstype:its-taConfidence.type" is identified as a class via > "rdf:type itstype:its-taConfidence.type" > So *if* one want to use "itstype:its-taConfidence.type" as a class, you'd need also > itstype:its-taConfidence.type rdf:type rdf:Class > > - classes are normally written in upper case, so > "its-taConfidence.type" would be > "Its-taConfidence.type" > > - As said in the offline thread (sorry for the repetition, guys), I would not define such classes at all. It would be sufficient to define actually no class - just use NIF URIs, and then have statements like this > > someNIFBasedSubjectUri > its:locQualityIssueComment[1] "'c'es' is unknown. Could be 'c'est'"; > its:locQualityIssueEnabled[1]="yes" ; > its:locQualityIssueSeverity[1] "50"; > its:locQualityIssueType "misspelling". > > The RDF predicates would take as a domain a NIF URI, and as the range an XML literal (or HTML literal, if we use RDF 1.1). > This approach has also the advantage that you can convert the test suite output easily to RDF "instance" data. > > - Felix > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 13:38:00 UTC