W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > March 2013

ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:37:32 +0100
Message-ID: <5155991C.5010208@kosek.cz>
To: David Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
CC: MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi Dave,

on the last telcon I have been tasked to "refresh" and try to move
forward some issues. Could you please implemented changes below into
proposed ITS RDF Ontology.

Thanks,

				Jirka

On 25.2.2013 9:04, MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/119
> 
> Raised by: Felix Sasaki
> On product: MLW-LT Standard Draft
> 
> Dave started an ITS RDF Ontology. See
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/ITS-RDF_mapping#Ontology_.28DRAFT.29
> This is useful for the NIF conversion.
> 
> There was an offline discussion about this, including Dave, Leroy, Sebastian and I.
> 
> Some thoughts about the ontology current at
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/ITS-RDF_mapping#Ontology_.28DRAFT.29
> 
> - the ontology uses various RDF classes that are not defined, e.g. "itstype:its-taConfidence.type" is identified as a class via
> "rdf:type itstype:its-taConfidence.type"
> So *if* one want to use "itstype:its-taConfidence.type" as a class, you'd need also
> itstype:its-taConfidence.type rdf:type rdf:Class
> 
> - classes are normally written in upper case, so
> "its-taConfidence.type" would be
> "Its-taConfidence.type"
> 
> - As said in the offline thread (sorry for the repetition, guys), I would not define such classes at all. It would be sufficient to define actually no class - just use NIF URIs, and then have statements like this
> 
> someNIFBasedSubjectUri   
> 	its:locQualityIssueComment[1] "'c'es' is unknown. Could be 'c'est'";   
> 	its:locQualityIssueEnabled[1]="yes" ;
> 	its:locQualityIssueSeverity[1] "50";
> 	its:locQualityIssueType "misspelling".
> 
> The RDF predicates would take as a domain a NIF URI, and as the range an XML literal (or HTML literal, if we use RDF 1.1).
> This approach has also the advantage that you can convert the test suite output easily to RDF "instance" data.
> 
> - Felix
> 
> 
> 

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------


Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 13:38:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:06 UTC