Transition request: FPWD of "Metadata for the Multilingual Web - Usage Scenarios and Implementations"

Hi Philippe,

here is a transition request for FPWD of "Metadata for the Multilingual 
Web - Usage Scenarios and Implementations".

Proposed shortname: mlw-metadata-us-impl

Working Group: MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/

Draft (in wiki layout, Felix will convert this to TR layout after approval)

http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary 


wiki2spec parameters ready at:
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/mlw-metadata-uc-impl/mlw-metadata-us-impl-wiki2spec.html#status


This version URI after approval 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-mlw-metadata-us-impl-20130306/

Latest version URI http://www.w3.org/TR/mlw-metadata-us-impl/



Decision of the Working Group to publish:

http://www.w3.org/2013/03/06-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item01

Abstract:

========
TheW3C Internationalization Tag Set 2.0 <http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/>- 
developed by theW3C MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group 
<http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/>enhances the 
foundation to integrate automated processing of human language into core 
Web technologies. ITS 2.0 bears many commonalities with is 
predecessorITS 1.0 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-its-20070403/>but 
provides additional concepts that are designed to foster the automated 
creation and processing of multilingual Web content. ITS 2.0 focuses on 
HTML, XML-based formats in general, and can leverage processing based on 
the XML Localization Interchange File Format (XLIFF), as well as the 
Natural Language Processing Interchange Format (NIF).

The W3C MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group received funding by the 
European Commission (projectLT-Web| 
<http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/language-technologies/project-multilingualweb-lt_en.html>) 
through the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) in the area of Language 
Technologies (Grant Agreement No. 287815). As part of their activities, 
members of the Working Group and the LT-Web project created various 
implementations that exemplify how ITS 2.0 supports automated processing 
of human language into core Web technologies. These implementations/the 
corresponding usage scenarios are sketched in this document. Each 
section of the document comprises the following:

  * Description - An explanation of the scenario
  * Data category usage - An explanation which of the ITS 2.0 data
    categories are involved in the automated processing; (for details on
    the data categories,W3C Internationalization Tag Set 2.0
    <http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/>has to be consulted)
  * Benefits - Reasons why the ITS 2.0 data categories enable or enhance
    the automated processing
  * Information on Implementation Status/Issues - Links to tools and
    implementers (detailed information, running software, source code etc.)

========

"status of this document" section:

========

/This section describes the status of this document at the time of its 
publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of 
current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical 
report can be found in theW3C technical reports index 
<http://www.w3.org/TR/>at http://www.w3.org/TR/./

This document describes usage scenarios and related implementations 
forInternationalization Tag Set (ITS) 2.0 <http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/>. 
ITS 2.0 enhances the foundation to integrate both automated and manual 
processing of human language into core Web technologies.

The work described in this document receives funding by the European 
Commission (projectMultilingualWeb-LT (LT-Web) 
<http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/language-technologies/project-multilingualweb-lt_en.html>) 
through the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) in the area of Language 
Technologies (Grant Agreement No. 287815).

This document is a First Public Working Draft published by 
theMultilingualWeb-LT Working Group 
<http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/>, part of theW3C 
Internationalization Activity 
<http://www.w3.org/International/Activity>. The Working Group expects to 
advance this Working Draft to Working Group Note (seeW3C document 
maturity levels 
<http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#maturity-levels>).

By publishing this working draft the working group does not express any 
consensus about the implementation approach, the use cases described or 
the proposed metadata items. The main purpose of this publication is to 
gather feedback from a wider audience.

Feedback about the content of this document is encouraged. Send your 
comments topublic-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org 
<mailto:public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org>. Use "Comment on 
Multilingual Web metadata usage scenarios and implementations WD" in the 
subject line of your email. Thearchives for this list 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/>are 
publicly available.

Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C 
Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or 
obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite 
this document as other than work in progress.

This document was produced by a group operating under the5 February 2004 
W3C Patent Policy 
<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/>. The group does 
not expect this document to become a W3C Recommendation. W3C maintains 
apublic list of any patent disclosures 
<http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/53116/status>made in connection with 
the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for 
disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent 
which the individual believes containsEssential Claim(s) 
<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential>must 
disclose the information in accordance withsection 6 of the W3C Patent 
Policy 
<http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure>.

========

Regards,
Dave Lewis, Felix Sasaki, David Filip
(mlw-lt co-chairs)