- From: Mārcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:42:21 +0200
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, 'Felix Sasaki' <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, Artūrs Vasiļevskis <arturs.vasilevskis@Tilde.lv>
Hi Felix, all, I also do not have anything against leaving everything as is. I however (as I made clear in my previous e-mail) don't think that the stand-off markup is a nice solution. Best regards, Mārcis ;o) -----Original Message----- From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 5:31 PM To: 'Felix Sasaki'; Mārcis Pinnis Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; Artūrs Vasiļevskis Subject: RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup Hi Felix, all, > Just a judgment from my side: I think at the moment we don't have > consensus for > > - leaving everything as is (Dave's proposal) I don't have anything against leaving things as is. There is nothing really broken. It's just that having both data categories fused would be a bit nicer. But overall if there is no time to make that work, we can indeed just leave it as it is. cheers, -yves
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 15:42:58 UTC