RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup from Yves Savourel on 2013-01-28 (public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org from January 2013)

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:31:27 -0700
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, 'Mārcis Pinnis' <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>
CC: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, 'Artūrs Vasiļevskis' <arturs.vasilevskis@Tilde.lv>
Message-ID: <assp.0740d1af8b.assp.0740ab4e73.01e901cdfd6c$89ed54a0$9dc7fde0$@com>

Hi Felix, all,

> Just a judgment from my side: I think at the moment 
> we don't have consensus for
>
> - leaving everything as is (Dave's proposal)

I don't have anything against leaving things as is.
There is nothing really broken.

It's just that having both data categories fused would be a bit nicer. But overall if there is no time to make that work, we can indeed just leave it as it is.

cheers,
-yves

Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 15:31:54 UTC