Re: Issue-55: RE: ACTION-447: Make a batch transformation of the test suite to xliff

Actually, i withdraw this particular comment. We had an implementation 
TC where David kindly explained the reasoning behind using :
<mrk mtype='x-its-term-no'>

(basically it is more friendly for XLIFF implementors)

So i'm happy with that.

We're updating the XLIFF mapping page to reflect this and a few other 

On 26/02/2013 00:39, Dave Lewis wrote:
> Doing it as <mrk mtype="term" its:term="no"> rather than a dedicated 
> mtype seems cleaner to me. It means a regular ITS processer will 
> understand this.  It also allows us the option of:
> <mrk mtype="term" its:term="no" its:termConfidence="0.5"> 

Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 17:37:27 UTC