- From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:38:35 +0000
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: "'Dr. David Filip'" <David.Filip@ul.ie>, 'MÄrcis Pinnis' <marcis.pinnis@tilde.lv>, 'Multilingual Web LT Public List Public List' <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, 'Felix Sasaki' <fsasaki@w3.org>
Actually, i withdraw this particular comment. We had an implementation TC where David kindly explained the reasoning behind using : <mrk mtype='x-its-term-no'> (basically it is more friendly for XLIFF implementors) So i'm happy with that. We're updating the XLIFF mapping page to reflect this and a few other suggestions/clarifications. cheers, Dave On 26/02/2013 00:39, Dave Lewis wrote: > Doing it as <mrk mtype="term" its:term="no"> rather than a dedicated > mtype seems cleaner to me. It means a regular ITS processer will > understand this. It also allows us the option of: > <mrk mtype="term" its:term="no" its:termConfidence="0.5">
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 17:37:27 UTC