RE: [All] high level use cases doc and wiki link

I think it would make sense to use the ITS one:

In the long run the IG would live longer than the WG.
And we have already put some ITS 2.0 info there, like the list of the LQI type values and their mapping to various tools.


-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Sasaki [] 
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [All] high level use cases doc and wiki link

Am 21.02.13 10:25, schrieb Pablo Nieto Caride:
> Hi Felix,
> I think that a good idea!
> As to what wiki to use, maybe it's better to leave the dead alone :)

Hi Pablo,

in principle you are right ... but one aspect is that in 2 years, maybe
will be dead ... anyway, we should just choose between the two wikis and groups - and rather soon, so that we can have links from the ITS2 and the to be published BP documents.

- Felix

> Cheers,
> Pablo.
> Hi all,
> I am wondering whether we should make our wiki editable by everybody 
> with a W3C account, and have a link from the high level use cases doc 
> at (will be life next week) to a wiki page.
> Rationale: The usage scenarios will soon be out of date: 
> implementations will evolve, usage scenarios change etc. So having a 
> link from the introduction at to the 
> wiki will allow us to keep info up to date. And if the wiki is public 
> write, we can gather a community around it.
> If we do that, me may also want to do it for other to be published "BP"
> documents.
> Now, one more thought is: should this be the MLW-LT wiki - or should 
> we move to the (these days rarely used) ITS IG wiki?
> The good thing about the ITS IG wiki
> is that everybody can join already. The bad thing is that ... it's "dead".
> So if we go above route, which wiki to use?
> Best,
> Felix

Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 15:42:14 UTC