RE: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC

Hi Dave,

 

FYI: For once we are on holiday today whilst Europeans are not... (a refreshing change :).

 

I’ll attend possibly part of the call.

my regrets if I don’t.

 

-yves

 

 

From: Dave Lewis [mailto:dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie] 
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 7:44 AM
To: Multilingual Web LT Public List
Subject: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC

 

Hi all,

A quick agenda for today's meeting. Felix is consumed with EU report preparation and can't make it today so I will chair.

Shout if there are any other items you'd like to add:

TIME AND DIAL-IN INFO: 

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20130218T15 <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20130213T11> 

http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Dial_in_info_for_regular_call

Minutes from Wed call: http://www.w3.org/2013/02/13-mlw-lt-minutes.html

TOPICS:

0) Minutes and agenda check

1) Quick feedback on Posters and use cases
The Wednesday call is allocated for reviewing these in detail, but given comments from felix:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0083.html
and christian:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0084.html
plus various problems with the poster template we will discuss this briefly to ensure input of suitable quality.

2) Issue-68: disambig/tan and term
update from Tadej, Marcis and christian
is there final agreement and what editorial actions are now required?

most recent posting from Tadej was:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0027.html

issue archive;
https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/68

3) Other pending issues:

ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-107: I18N-ISSUE-246: Clarify character encoding behavior when calculating storage size [ITS-20]
Discuss response form Norbert:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0028.html

[ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list
see response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0032.html

ISSUE-110: latest input from Jirka, but does this change decision to remove XHTML form test suite?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0085.html

Dave