RE: [Action-484] Create an ABNF based on

> So I would propose to close the issue during tomorrow's call 
> with an action to put the ABNF in the spec. 

and change the examples.
(somewhere at some point we had an email with the equivalent expressions without using the substraction, but I can't find it).

> We even can keep the reference on XML Schema since the ABNF is a proper subset.

Sure. As long as we make sure to clearly state that the allowed expression is only a sub-set of the of XML Schema Character Classes construct.


Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:35:07 UTC