- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:49:40 +0200
- To: joerg@bioloom.de
- Cc: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL58czq6_EAOGV-v+5te3RNPdP+ncoTPaxJH2u0cHR+_1Oa77w@mail.gmail.com>
2012/9/26 "Prof. Dr. Jörg Schütz" <joerg@bioloom.de> > Nice idea! In addition, what about considering a global repository with > discoverable tool descriptions through a unique id (aka URI/IRI)? > Good point. The proposal discussed in Prague is based on Yves' proposal below and would accomodate tool identification via a URI - so you could point to such a registry. Felix > > Cheers -- Jörg > > > On Sep 26, 2012 at 07:04 (CEST), Yves Savourel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> One thought for the issue of referencing tools : >> >> We could have a lone its:toolRefs attribute that belong to no data >> category and can be placed anywhere. >> >> It would take one or more composite values. Each one made of: >> - a data category identifier >> - the id of a tool description item in the external tools list. >> >> e.g: toolRef='datacatId1/toolId1 datacatId2/toolId2' >> >> The behavior would be that tool-id for a given data category is >> overridden only if the attribute specifies a new tool-id for that data >> category. >> >> For example: if we have a first instance its:toolRefs='mtConfidence/t-**1' >> in the document >> And then one of its children elements has its:toolRefs='disamiguation/t-* >> *2' >> The current tool id for mtConfidence would still be t-1 >> >> This would allow to use toolRefs on several overlapping data categories, >> without losing information. >> It's basically like if each data category had its own toolRef attribute. >> >> Just a thought. >> -yves >> >> > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 08:50:06 UTC