Re: Separate conformance class for HTML5

On 15.10.2012 12:23, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> +1. We just need to make sure that in this conformance class the same
> aspects like in xml conformance are taken into account, like: at least
> global or local selection, inheritance and defaults are mandatory (if
> applicable), overriding is always complete. 

OK, I tried to come up with something:

http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#conformance

> I am saying this because of the
> latest provenance draft that turned complete overriding off for the
> combination of local HTML5 markup and global rules. That doesn't work.

Uhm, I wasn't following dicussion very closely as I'm not provenance
expert. Could you please point me to a draft in a question.
In general it would be very bad to have different processing models for
different categories.

    Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 13:10:05 UTC