- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:09:35 +0200
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 13:10:05 UTC
On 15.10.2012 12:23, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> +1. We just need to make sure that in this conformance class the same
> aspects like in xml conformance are taken into account, like: at least
> global or local selection, inheritance and defaults are mandatory (if
> applicable), overriding is always complete.
OK, I tried to come up with something:
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#conformance
> I am saying this because of the
> latest provenance draft that turned complete overriding off for the
> combination of local HTML5 markup and global rules. That doesn't work.
Uhm, I wasn't following dicussion very closely as I'm not provenance
expert. Could you please point me to a draft in a question.
In general it would be very bad to have different processing models for
different categories.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 13:10:05 UTC