- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:09:35 +0200
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 13:10:05 UTC
On 15.10.2012 12:23, Felix Sasaki wrote: > +1. We just need to make sure that in this conformance class the same > aspects like in xml conformance are taken into account, like: at least > global or local selection, inheritance and defaults are mandatory (if > applicable), overriding is always complete. OK, I tried to come up with something: http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#conformance > I am saying this because of the > latest provenance draft that turned complete overriding off for the > combination of local HTML5 markup and global rules. That doesn't work. Uhm, I wasn't following dicussion very closely as I'm not provenance expert. Could you please point me to a draft in a question. In general it would be very bad to have different processing models for different categories. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 13:10:05 UTC