RE: [] Re: [Issue-55] XLIFF mapping from Yves Savourel on 2012-11-08 (public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org from November 2012)

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 15:27:52 -0700
To: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <assp.0659942b2f.assp.06593dd586.007701cdbe00$4add7fc0$e0987f40$@com>

> I would propose to close issue-51 (too many global rules) - not 
> only given the XLIFF timeline, but also other discussions (e.g. 
> about mtconfidence) I don't think that we will reach consensus 
> within the next weeks what global rules to drop and what not.
> I would, however, propose an action item for each data category 
> owner to come up with "as realistic as possible" examples to 
> demonstrate the usefulness of global rules.

Sound reasonable.

-ys

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 22:37:40 UTC