Re: [Action-32] Štajner to clarify the (non) need to aprse RDF, but the need to parse RDFa and microdata parsing

Thanks Tadej, sounds good to me, if there are no objections, please report
it as closed to Dave, who is taking over the AI tracking now.

Best regards
dF

Dr. David Filip
=======================
LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
*cellphone: +353-86-0222-158*
facsimile: +353-6120-2734
mailto: david.filip@ul.ie



On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 14:02, Tadej Stajner <tadej.stajner@ijs.si> wrote:

>  Hi, David,
>  there was some overlap between the ISSUE-2 discussion and this action
> item - I believe that the conclusion we arrived at satisifies both points.
> To put explicitly:
>
> The requirements are:
> - some downstream consumers of the marked-up data need a chance at simply
> integrating it with other RDF datasets. There should be a clear
> transformation path from the "ITSx" mark-up to RDF.
> - on the other hand, we don't want to require every producer and consumer
> implementing our standard that they are able to reason in RDF;
> - we want to keep the standard markup concise - we want to avoid requiring
> people to explicitly produce markup that makes no immediate sense (defining
> resources and URIs for every annotated content fragment can be too verbose,
> and against the 'mark-up text' philosophy).
> - not breaking browser's HTML rendering
>
> Our strategy is:
> - defining a transformation from "ITSx" to RDF assertions (for RDFa, RDFa
> Lite, Microdata)
> - defining a recipe (algorithm) for representing content fragments within
> the document in order to have things representable in pure RDF
> - specifying the value spaces of certain attributes to be RDF resources,
> where it makes sense to do so, for instance, genre, topic, entity,
> entityType (NERD, schema.org)
> - an implementation MAY implement the transformations from HTML5+ITS to
> HTML+RDFa/RDFa Lite/Microdata
>
> -- Tadej
>
>
>
> On 3/29/2012 1:25 PM, Dr. David Filip wrote:
>
> Tadej, can you please elaborate on this?
>
>  If you did as part of the Issue-2 discussion please explain explicitly
> in reply to this e-mail.
> Thanks
> dF
>
>  Dr. David Filip
>  =======================
> LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
> University of Limerick, Ireland
> telephone: +353-6120-2781
> *cellphone: +353-86-0222-158*
> facsimile: +353-6120-2734
> mailto: david.filip@ul.ie
>
>
>