Re: General note on the ITS 2.0 spec

On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:14 +0200, Arle Lommel wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm going through the ITS 2.0 draft quite carefully and marking up a
> copy for the next edit.
> I encountered one systematic issue: the existing draft refers
> primarily to XML. Since we want to support HTML5, any thoughts on how
> to refer to this support? Obviously not all locations will refer to
> HTML5 as well, but for those that do, should I call this "XML and HTM5
> +ITS" or something else?
> I will try and create a list of areas where the description needs to
> be updated in this regard since this aspect will need careful
> attention.

I noticed also that whenever we define the local implementation
of a data category, we do it only by the XML attribute names.
We provide examples and RNG for HTML5 local attributes, but
no prose.


Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 16:29:26 UTC